Thursday, October 23, 2008

Do Women Dislike Men With Big Noses

Letters on land use - Castles

To the heading "Write to your senator" here is a letter to Castelli senatur we address softly to know "but we do or are you there?" Everything was born from Exit (LA7), the theme was "the cement". Castelli, a guest in transmission, speaks in tones that range from fatalistic resignation, the judge an inevitable phenomenon, says that the damage is done, there's nothing more to be groped.

A tsunami of cranes and concrete appears to have overwhelmed all of the divine will.

While respecting the mystical vein we seemed too blatant found a shortcut by Senator, the letter we suggest a more secular view of things and the urge to take over the problem and take action with a bill.

Gentile sen. Castelli,

I saw last night at Exit. the transmission of television La7. There was talk of overbuilding in the area and land use. At one point after having gutted the plight Italian, more than other nations victim of this phenomenon, we have gone in search of those responsible, everyone is more or less agreed that the greatest responsibility are the mayors. A bit 'for a wrong concept of development (which is identified with the building artefact), a little' indifference to environmental issues, a bit 'to make ends meet, at the end of the mayors go to sacrifice the country, with a loss which all have recognized and deplored.

When the word is passed to you in some way I expected it to assume the responsibility for the status quo. I mean she and the center-right government have been for two thirds of the last 15 years. Few years have indeed seen a building boom (think bigger than the war) which is built too much and hurt. We are devastated with the territory and a huge housing problem, full of empty houses and no houses to be given to the people. Now agree that if the auditors had been more virtuous with their master plans now perhaps we'd better put, but do not you think it would be appropriate to make a beautiful national law on land use, to control the use, severely limiting the use of land free? They did it in England, Germany, France, the Netherlands. Someone sets goals in terms of consumption of hectares per year, for example, saying "do not consume more than 10,000 hectares a year and get under the 5,000 within 10 years", others require that we build, mainly reusing brownfield sites, enabling minimally the use of free soil.

I was shocked and then feeling it take away from the problem, only recognizing the responsibilities of mayors, say that the harm is there and you can not do anything.

Due considerazioni

- Poteva essere fatto molto, non c'era nemmeno da inventarsi nulla bastava ispirarsi ai paesi più virtuosi. E questa è una responsabilità in primis dei governi e del parlamento. Se oggi l'Italia è oggettivamente inguardabile in molte sue lande, la responsabilità è spalmata sulla politica dell'ultimo mezzo secolo, ma il fatto che negli ultimi 15 anni, pur essendo ormai matura la consapevolezza del problema, non sia prodotto un quadro normativo, consentendo di fatto il boom nei termini in cui è avvenuto, è francamente imperdonabile.

- E' vero che il danno è fatto ma è anche vero che, come confermano i piani regolatori più or less "aggressive" the immense urban Italian, another piece of land is about to leave. The damage then continues every day, keep on building sites where material is required of the sarcophagus, still at the design of the lords of the brick buildings in an empty space where the political map, an agricultural area, it is only an option, vacuum to be filled. And then the question of whether something can be done, the answer can only be positive, Senator, we are an emergency. My "do something" and write this letter, I hope that it will be a bill.

Sincerely